Israel finds positive aspects in deal Iran's deal with West

Read on the website Vestnik Kavkaza

By Peter Lyukimson, Israel, exclusively for Vestnik Kavkaza

Yoel Guzansky, a scientist of the Israeli Institute for National Security, said that the deal between Iran and the West had positive aspects for Israel. “I do not agree with those who describe the case as though a nuclear catastrophe will happen tomorrow. On the contrary, I think that it is very important to continue the dialogue with the US and strengthen all positive of the temporary agreement in a permanent agreement, trying to negate all the negative ones,” says Guzansky.

The expert clarified that the most important part of the agreement is the recognition of Iran as a nuclear state, bringing it out of international isolation, ignoring the fact that Iran remains one of the main guide of Islamic terror forces and the main sponsor of terrorist organizations Hezbollah and Hamas. Guzansky believes that the negative sides of the Geneva agreements are what should be discussed.

Guzansky sees other threat in prevalence of economic interests over the strategic ones. Iran and the West will immediately start making profit from lifting sanctions. Even if Tehran gets caught violating the agreements, giving up such money would be very hard.

Concerning the positive moments of the agreement for Israel, experts note the fact that it neutralizes Iranian uranium enriched to 20%. Many sanctions, mainly banking and financial restrictions for Iran, will remain in force. The nuclear program will indeed be partly frozen and put under better control.

Amos Yadlin, ex-Head of the Military Intelligence Directorate of Israel, stated that, in any case, the final version of the agreement was a lot better for Israel than its draft 10 days before signing. It means that the efforts of Netanyahu and Israeli diplomats were not wasted. Israeli journalist Nahum Barnea compared the Geneva agreement with Israeli cheese, saying that it had many ‘holes’, although it was not the end of the world.

At the same time, the struggle for composition of text for a permanent agreement for Israel is starting. Yitzhak Molcho, a lawyer and personal representative of Benjamin Netanyahu, will visit Washington in the near future to discuss the text. The half a year remaining to sign the final agreement will be exceptionally tense for Israel.

By Peter Lyukimson, Israel, exclusively for Vestnik KavkazaYoel Guzansky, a scientist of the Israeli Institute for National Security, said that the deal between Iran and the West had positive aspects for Israel.“I do not agree with those who describe the case as though a nuclear catastrophe will happen tomorrow. On the contrary, I think that it is very important to continue the dialogue with the US and strengthen all positive of the temporary agreement in a permanent agreement, trying to negate all the negative ones,” says Guzansky.The expert clarified that the most important part of the agreement is the recognition of Iran as a nuclear state, bringing it out of international isolation, ignoring the fact that Iran remains one of the main guide of Islamic terror forces and the main sponsor of terrorist organizations Hezbollah and Hamas. Guzansky believes that the negative sides of the Geneva agreements are what should be discussed.Guzansky sees other threat in prevalence of economic interests over the strategic ones. Iran and the West will immediately start making profit from lifting sanctions. Even if Tehran gets caught violating the agreements, giving up such money would be very hard.Concerning the positive moments of the agreement for Israel, experts note the fact that it neutralizes Iranian uranium enriched to 20%. Many sanctions, mainly banking and financial restrictions for Iran, will remain in force. The nuclear program will indeed be partly frozen and put under better control.Amos Yadlin, ex-Head of the Military Intelligence Directorate of Israel, stated that, in any case, the final version of the agreement was a lot better for Israel than its draft 10 days before signing. It means that the efforts of Netanyahu and Israeli diplomats were not wasted. Israeli journalist Nahum Barnea compared the Geneva agreement with Israeli cheese, saying that it had many ‘holes’, although it was not the end of the world.At the same time, the struggle for composition of text for a permanent agreement for Israel is starting. Yitzhak Molcho, a lawyer and personal representative of Benjamin Netanyahu, will visit Washington in the near future to discuss the text. The half a year remaining to sign the final agreement will be exceptionally tense for Israel