Rinf: "What methods of propaganda are used in the United States against Russia"

The British independent analytical publication Rinf wrote today about what methods of propaganda and why are used in the United States against Russia. The owners of the American media resources understand that in order to serve their fellow aristocrats from the US government, who want to displace the current leader of Russia Vladimir Putin in order to be able to subsequently repurchase the natural resources and  highly educated workforce, a PR campaign for the high society must be maintained by ‘respected media resources’ such as Foreign Policy, rather than the right wing media, which is represented, for example, by radical Fox News.

The most important thing to note today is that the US media reports about placing NATO troops on the borders with Russia, which are needed to finish Barack Obama’s job started  in February 2014 to destabilize Russia and provoking a military conflict on the pretext of defending democracy. However, the media are silent about the fact that  Maidan in Ukraine was not a democratic revolution, but a well-planned action of the United States, the leadership of which is trying to establish global hegemony by  the  means well-proven in other countries.

Second, what the US media writes about, is a threat posed by Russia to America and the world, openly referring to the country as to aggressor. Such a false image of the American editions of Russia lead to the fact that the public in the United States do not understand the true motives of conflict with Russia and the Kremlin is really s taken as an aggressor, which plays to the hands of the US government receiving  the necessary support.

In fact, all the propaganda of American media aims to distract the public from serious internal problems, such as poverty, lack of funding for the medical sector and the problems with immigrants. Huge cost savings gained from the US taxpayers are going to fund the military-industrial complex, allowing the American elite get more profit. The policy of silence and distortion of reality is still playing into the hands of the American leadership, but it is clear that Russia's foreign policy, aimed at  search for new partners in Europe, Asia, South America and Africa will soon bear fruit, turning against the radical US policy.

The US independent publication CATO Institute wrote that an agreement on the Iranian nuclear program could mean the end for the US business. Another reason against Iran to accept the agreement lies in the fact that it can cause a very severe blow to the US corporations. The United States has the highest corporate tax rate in the world, and the American companies are much more affected by legislation than foreign competitors. Currently, America prohibits virtually all trade with Iran, as well as other economic activities.

If Congress passes the agreement and the sanctions against Iran are lifted, the US businessmen will be in even worse position, due to the fact that the Iranian goods and services will make a tangible  competition to the American goods. There are many reasons why the deal could not take place: the inability to monitor the nuclear activities of Iran, the competition in the energy market, as well as the inability to establish a desired dialogue with the Iranian leadership. However, if the agreement is accepted, the possibility of another war in the Middle East is reduced to a great extent. But at the same time, the American corporations will not be able to cooperate at the level of Russian, Chinese and European companies that are already beginning to enter into the agreements with Iran.